Vance Trump has privately admitted through direct messages that he did exactly what I’m accusing him of. He has since deleted those communications in an apparent attempt to avoid accountability for abusing this platform and targeting users—either because he dislikes them personally or opposes their political views.

This is not just harassment. It’s targeted political suppression and, arguably, election interference in New York. I’ve lost hours of work due to his actions. He should face consequences too.

By his own admission, he violated GETTR’s Terms of Service by intentionally targeting a campaign account for deplatforming. His actions were deliberate. If I committed any infraction, I was never notified by platform staff or given any official warning. What he calls a “warning,” I call coordinated targeting to silence and suppress.

I still have not received any explanation from GETTR regarding the ban. The only statement that exists is a public comment, which I’ve included below along with AI-assisted analysis to explain the context. It makes clear this was an act of harassment. To further illustrate this, Vance Trump followed my new account within seconds of its creation—without any public interaction—clearly monitoring me.

I regret having to make this public, but my campaign has already suffered publicly, and this is now the only viable path forward. No one seems willing to correct what has gone wrong.

I have documented everything I could. Even though posts and comments have been deleted, GETTR support can be compelled by the courts to produce all relevant communications and data should this escalate to legal action.

The choice is now in your hands: Will you protect a rogue user abusing their position, or will you stand for the principles of free speech and fair use on your platform?

This isn’t just about my campaign’s right to run for public office—it’s about the rights of every user here. Many of us joined this platform for exactly that reason: to speak freely.

Original Comment:

“(Supporter) don’t fall for jaynation_4547’s scheme and bullshit – Jay was banned for the same exact reasons listed above and much much more – I told Jay on my other account DJT47 (yes I have Jay blocked because I hate assholes who mouth off) if he didn’t stop he’d be banned and what he did was mouth off to me so I filed a report to my supervisor to have jay banned. Took awhile to get him terminated but he wouldn’t stop and there’s no coming back from this graveyard. If he keeps the spamming up with repetitive replies in…”

Analysis:

1. Tone:

• Hostile and inflammatory: The use of profanity (“bullshit”, “assholes”) and personal insults indicates strong negative emotion—likely rooted in a personal grudge.
• Boastful: The commenter appears to take credit for your ban, presenting it as a victory or punishment.
• Vindictive: This is not just criticism; it’s a confession of intent to harm your presence on GETTR.

1. Intent:

• Discredit you publicly by labeling your message as a “scheme.”
• Justify your ban by suggesting you deserved it for “mouthing off.”
• Warn others not to support or engage with you.
• Establish dominance by claiming to have direct influence with a “supervisor.”

1. Key Takeaways:

• Admission of misconduct: The user openly admits to orchestrating your ban for personal reasons—not platform violations. This could be useful in appealing or escalating the issue with GETTR or exposing cancel culture behavior.
• Targeted harassment: This isn’t just a one-time insult—it’s an attempt to destroy your platform and reputation by any means necessary.
• Manipulative tactics: By addressing a supporter directly, the person is trying to peel away your base using lies and intimidation.

1. Legal/Policy Implication (optional):

If GETTR has terms protecting users from abuse of the reporting system or targeted harassment, this message is damning evidence. They may have violated TOS themselves by weaponizing internal connections to “supervisors.”